"Mortgage backed securities, subprime loans, tranches...
Pretty confusing right? Does it make you feel bored?
 Or stupid? Well, it's supposed to." 
- Ryan Gosling as Jared Vennett

A film about the 2007 financial crisis is, naturally, bound by long, indecipherable words, phrases and acronyms created by those who want to make it as difficult to understand as possible, a point that Gosling’s Vennett makes pretty clear early on. However, The Big Short is anything but ‘bored’ or ‘stupid’.

When it comes to the majority stockholders of Wall Street’s exclusive stock in, ‘Immorality’, which currently stands at IMM +489%, it begs the question: who really profits in the land of the debaucherous, greedy, and fraudulent?

When you picture the ivy league, ivory tower dwelling button pushers and Dom drunkards of Wall Street it’s difficult to shake the image of orangutans in suits, carrying a superiority complex in the shape of a Delvaux calf-skin Presse Briefcase (pick up your own for a stylish $4,500).

Paramount Pictures

But, while ‘clueless money grabbing apes’ is the image McKay builds of the complete Wall Street population he does so for very purposeful reasons. Although the few who did manage to profit from the financial crash of 2007 are by no means heroes there is an eerie sense of idolisation in McKay’s self-aware screenplay that plays the Wall Street elite against those looking for an easy buck.

Both are morally questionable yet we can’t help but side with those that took the leap and pre-empted the financial crash, profiting big time while everyone else joined the queue at the job fair. Shame on us! I guess Mark Baum’s incensed justice crusade is kind of admirable but that’s a stretch.

But who were the profiteers of this little scheme? Michael Burry (Christian Bale), Mark Baum (Steve Carell), Jared Vennett, Jamie Shipley (Finn Wittrock) and Charlie Geller (John Magaro). The latter two greatly assisted by Ben Rickert (Brad Pitt). I’m not going to begin to try and explain the ins and outs of Burry’s foresight as Margot Robbie’s bathtime cameo (yup, that’s a thing) was all too distracting but I get the gist.

Paramount Pictures

Burry saw that the American housing market was heading for impending doom and sought to profit from another’s loss. While everyone seemed to laugh this socially awkward fund manager out the door, his pockets some $100 million lighter, others paid close attention and soon it was those that were willing to look that saw the opportunity Burry had discovered. Or in the case of Vennett, those that were willing to read between the lines of seemingly contrived water hole bragging.

This is where Ryan Gosling, as Vennett, comes into his own. McKay’s decision to instil Vennett with a sense of freedom to push the boundaries of exposition through ingenius fourth wall breaks makes for inspired comic relief in an otherwise dreary numbers game; and this is where McKay bridges the gap between reality and fiction.

Paramount Pictures

Where other true stories, as depicted on film, tiptoe around the truth, cut corners, or fashion new ‘non-fictions’ without acknowledgement, McKay subverts the norm. Using his comedy chops McKay pokes fun at the inconsistencies by having Vennett point them out in humanising fourth wall breaks. Thus, devoiding the viewer of any doubt concerning the truthfulness of such an important event in the history of global economics.

Credit where it’s due, not many directors could pull that off and McKay certainly has a knack for adaptations that hopefully we’ll get to see more of, the new Bennett Miller perhaps?

The fourth wall breaks are brilliant, as are the cameos and visual presentations (Vennett’s Jenga stunt and Selena Gomez’ blackjack demonstration are particular highlights). But some have criticised these methods as ‘condescending’, ‘belittling’, even ‘arrogant’: there’s just no pleasing some.

Perhaps a little irony in the soundtrack will sort those antagonisers out? Featuring an ecclectic mix from Burry’s heavy metal ‘Mastodon’ downtime to The Pussycat Dolls, Led Zeppelin, Gorillaz, Kelis, and Guns’n’Roses amongst others, the soundtrack always strikes an absurdly fitting chord to complement the matchstick fragility of even the sturdiest of human constructions. I’m looking at you fraudulent mortgage market.

A lot has been said about the ensemble cast of The Big Short. You’ve got Christian Bale, Steve Carell, Ryan Gosling, Brad Pitt as well as cameos from Margot Robbie and Selena Gomez. Some big names, sure, but again McKay proves his dramatic hand by pulling an intriguing stunt. With that much talent on screen it’s tempting to throw them all in together and sometimes that works well, sorry American Hustle not you. But neither Christian Bale or Brad Pitt have any screen time with the other characters. This way McKay is able to tell four very different experiences of the same story and it works incredibly well.

There’s also a pretty great supporting cast of small timers who embrace the roles they’re given and really afford the big boys a little breathing room. Meticulous casting is worthy of the praise and if there was an Academy Award for it Kathy Driscoll and Francine Maisler would be taking home the bacon.

The Big Short, garnering five Oscar nominations including Best Picture, is a meticulous lesson in inventive storytelling, a Must-see for the stand-out performances, incredible screenplay from Charles Randolph and Adam McKay and a subversion of the ‘true story’ adaptation rulebook.

* * * *

~ [Remorseful] – “Okay, sell it all.” ~


9 thoughts on “CBSC+RGBP+AM=TBS – THE BIG SHORT – review

  1. Excellent points. I just watched this and am still making up my mind. I’m not sure if I enjoyed the cameos explaining stuff… I think the whole point of economics and whatnot is that it is confusing enough that people have other people do their taxes, buy and manage stocks etc. I still have no idea what they were talking about, or how they made money from it all, but it was an entertaining film. Not really funny, but still a great watch

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Ha, yeah! The fact that Gosling’s characer makes that exact point early on sets the tone for the rest of the film really. It’s heavily satirised from the get go but manages to deliver a well packaged warning to society. A great combination of complex writing that shines brighter than the whole film.


      1. While not understanbding the jargon AT ALL, I found myself piecing it together… so that is a bad thing, that is a good thing etc etc. So I was never confused. Great write up again, I don’t know what to write about this

        Liked by 1 person

        1. It’s fairly easy to follow in terms of plot so there’s no real demand to understand the ins and outs. I hate it when that happens, some reviews come so easily, others are a real pain in the butt


  2. This is a sell for me. Great review, James. Normally our opinions align. So i apologize for this hehe, but maybe it can spark an opinion debate ;)

    I did not dig on this so called tasty treat. I didn’t find it condescending, I found it dumbed down. It literally told us how to feel. The teaching segments aka the 4th wall breaking sucked the life out of the picture. Movies are about showing us not telling us, Short does a show and tell, for grade schoolers. I was with it, until the 4th wall. I really liked Carrell, and the young investors, but that’s it.

    I’ve seen documentaries on the subject that are much more entertaining. Let’s say I’m in the minority here… but 25 years later, I don’t think we’ll be talking about this like Wall Street, or Wolf of Wall Street.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Shame you didn’t enjoy it as much as I did but I can see why people find issue with it. I never got the feeling that the film was telling me how to feel even though I knew it was happening, if that makes sense? The fourth wall breaks were quite disruptive at times, some worked, some didn’t and the cameos had the same effect. However, I found the originality of the approach to such a serious subject quite refreshing. A story about the Global economic collapse could easily have turned into some melancholic mood affair but McKay satirised the entire US financial/economic sector to the point where the viewer is actually shaking his head and laughing inwardly at how truth really does hurt. Human beings brought about the destruction of a human construct through greed and ignorance. I just thought the whole thing was deeper than a few fourth wall breaks and cameos, I didn’t understand it all but I understood enough and I really enjoyed it.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Great comments. I agree with a lot of it. The 4th wall was the biggest issue, which boils down to a viewer’s personal preference (kinda like flashbacks and narrations – it’s love or hate). I liked the satirical elements. And some of Gosling’s shtick worked too. I think this sort of movie is important, but prefer a more grounded approach to the storytelling, like SPOTLIGHT. I really enjoyed the way they presented that controversial tale, that was just as dense and complex, with huge societal ramifications as well. I love talking intellectually about film and really appreciate our back and forth. It’s so much better than an opinionated YouTube comments section or something ;)

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Ha love it! YouTube comments are hilarious, some of the poop people spit out cracks me up! I’m still yet to see Spotlight but I gather the storytelling is a lot more grounded. I’m a fan of both grounded and a but more zany so I think I’ll enjoy both of these societal films equally which is great

          Liked by 1 person

Share your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s